Czech domicile law was quite complicated when it was codified during the second half of 19th century. First domicile law was accepted by Austrian government during the large land administration system reform in 1849 and it was reworked in 1863. Institute of domicile law was in place til 1948 when it was replaced by the residency law.
The domicile law was needed when serfdom was revoked after the revolution of 1848. Most people were subject to some domain before 1848, they were serfs and they belonged to that domain. The village where they lived had some duties in case their inhabitants needed assistance - such as poor people living in poorhouse (pastouška in Czech), receiving basic help from their neighbours. But there were no legal obligations which would state how the village administration should take care of those people.
Domicile certificate of my grandmother Vlasta Čudlíková, 1947.
Law of 1863 was valid til 1948 - Czechoslovak republic which was created in 1918 decided to keep this law valid because it was useful. This law stated every person was related to some village and it was possible to gain domicile law in four ways:
- by birth (after the father);
- by marriage (after the husband);
- by granting from the municipal office (usually after long-term stay in the village and paying its taxes);
- by official decree (usually for state employees such as policemen, teachers, officers etc.).
It also stated basic duties of the village - every "domicile" person had a right to stay in the village, to be taken care of by the village. This was often very expensive - the village had to pay every expense from its budget (ie. food, flat and anything else needed) for those who were not able to provide themselves. Every person had to belong to some village - if someone was homeless or it wasn't possible to decide where he belongs, he was assigned to some village by the decision from above (district court or administration).
It wasn't too easy to gain domicile rights in another village - the municipalities were of course afraid to grant the domicile rights to people who were poor or not paying enough in taxes. The easiest was how to gain domicile rights was to be wealthy - and even then it wasn't sure you will succeed.
Thank you Blanka for the explanation. I have several ancestors who were "prislusnik" to a village, it is now much easier to understand.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the explanation, Blanko! I appreciate it. This makes it clearer why in ahmp.cz Soupis pražského obyvatelstva is divided into Pražští příslušníci and Cizí příslušníci.
ReplyDeleteMy father had a problem when an employer in 1950s or 1960s was interested in hiring him in Prague. He was told that in order to extend him a job offer, he had to be a resident of Prague. But in order to be a resident in Prague, he had to be employed in Prague. He eventually worked it out, but it was never clear to me how the process of moving from one domicile to another was done.
Blanka. Is there any database online where I cann search for these Domovský List? My ancestors lived in Rosshaupt (Rozvadov)
ReplyDeleteI had four instances in my family of church and marriage records between 1854 and 1859 that used the phrase “příslušný k obci Mahouš.” It wasn't until Blanka pointed me to this blog from 2014 that its full meaning was understood. Thanks, Blanka!
ReplyDelete